HomeHealthMargaret Atwood Once Thought 'Handmaid's Tale' Was 'Too Far-Fetched.' No Longer. |...

Margaret Atwood Once Thought ‘Handmaid’s Tale’ Was ‘Too Far-Fetched.’ No Longer. | NEWSRUX

Writer Margaret Atwood revealed Friday that she initially delay writing her horrifying dystopian novel “The Handmaid’s Story” as a result of she thought it was “too far-fetched.” However after the leak of a draft Supreme Court docket opinion, she’ll by no means really feel that means once more.

“Foolish me. Theocratic dictatorships don’t lie solely within the distant previous: There are a variety of them on the planet right this moment. What’s to forestall america from changing into one among them?” she requested in a column revealed Friday in The Atlantic.

In Atwood’s novel, ladies in America are used as reproductive slaves, strictly ruled by a theocratic dictatorship directed by males. Atwood’s mannequin was based mostly on seventeenth century New England Puritan spiritual guidelines and jurisprudence — and imported to the U.S.

Supreme Court docket Justice Samuel Alito additionally turned to the 1600s for justifying his leaked opinion that will intestine the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling that made abortion authorized, reaching past the problems raised in a problem to a Mississippi anti-abortion regulation. He cited a number of occasions the English jurist Matthew Hale, who opposed abortions — and executed “witches.”

The leaked opinion (which hasn’t been finalized) would “overthrow settled regulation of fifty years on the grounds that abortion isn’t talked about … . True sufficient,” Atwood conceded. “The Structure has nothing to say about ladies’s reproductive well being. However the authentic doc doesn’t point out ladies in any respect.”

Girls “have been intentionally excluded from the franchise,” she added, referring to the fledgling nation. Solely males would now not be taxed “with out illustration” or be dominated with out “consent.” Girls have been barred from voting till 1920.

“Girls have been nonpersons in U.S. regulation for lots longer than they’ve been individuals,” Atwood chillingly famous. “If we begin overthrowing settled regulation utilizing Justice Samuel Alito’s justifications, why not repeal votes for girls?”

As for banning abortion, the assumption about when life begins relies on private or spiritual beliefs (some religions, for instance, consider life begins at beginning or {that a} pregnant girl’s life is the prevailing life that should be protected).

Now, in Alito’s opinion, “That which is a sin inside a sure set of spiritual beliefs is to be made a criminal offense for all,” Atwood wrote. But the Structure calls for that “Congress shall make no regulation respecting an institution of faith, or prohibiting the free train thereof.” If a faith permits abortion, how can a distinct faith limit it for these with completely different beliefs?

“It should be easy: If you happen to consider in ‘ensoulment’ at conception, you shouldn’t get an abortion, as a result of to take action is a sin inside your faith. If you don’t so consider, you shouldn’t — below the Structure — be certain by the spiritual beliefs of others,” Atwood argued.

The Alito opinion “seems to be nicely on the way in which to establishing a state faith,” Atwood added, and is popping again to the seventeenth century, when Colonial ladies have been burned on the stake based mostly on spiritual proof.

“If Justice Alito needs you to be ruled by the legal guidelines of the seventeenth Century, it’s best to take a detailed have a look at that century,” Atwood warned. “Is that whenever you wish to reside?”

Try the complete column right here.

#Margaret #Atwood #Thought #Handmaids #Story #FarFetched #Longer


New updates